Following on from my previous post about pictorialism: I've reached a place where I can admit that I've been unhappy with my photographs for about as long as I've been taking them.
Phew! That wasn't so hard to admit.
There are a variety of reasons for this but I think it comes down to two basic elements which are reflected in every photograph:
I am an IT person and I guess I've gravitated towards that career because I'm naturally the kind of person who thinks in squares and rectangles. When I conceptualise something it's all about Right-Angles - action and reaction, cause and effect. In other words, I am a logical thinker, rather than an abstract or artistic thinker.
This naturally affects my photography - my images will tend to be somewhat technical concoctions, rather than meaningful works of artistic expression. This is a natural consequence of the way my brain works.
The problem arises from the fact that I enjoy photography from others that reflects the more creative, artistic side of photography, and wish I could emulate it.
But dreaming up a photo and pre-visualising it are extremely challenging. Once I have the idea, it's a different matter - because then it's just a technical exercise in realising it. Give me a theme and tell me to take a captivating photograph of it and I'll be lost. But describe the image to me and I'll do it.
Answers I've sought include:
For example: This is one of my favourite images that I made recently:
(It's OK, you don't have to like it!)
I've had this new approach for a couple of months now and I am pleased to report that everyone thinks I've gone insane. But I've been enjoying photography a lot more for it, and I'm actually starting to like some of the images that result from it.
I'm still going to practice the whole "concept and pre-visualisation" thing, but I've decided that this particular skill isn't strictly necessary in order to call yourself a photographer (as opposed to someone who merely takes photographs)
Phew! That wasn't so hard to admit.
There are a variety of reasons for this but I think it comes down to two basic elements which are reflected in every photograph:
- Art, and
- Technical Skill
I am an IT person and I guess I've gravitated towards that career because I'm naturally the kind of person who thinks in squares and rectangles. When I conceptualise something it's all about Right-Angles - action and reaction, cause and effect. In other words, I am a logical thinker, rather than an abstract or artistic thinker.
This naturally affects my photography - my images will tend to be somewhat technical concoctions, rather than meaningful works of artistic expression. This is a natural consequence of the way my brain works.
The problem arises from the fact that I enjoy photography from others that reflects the more creative, artistic side of photography, and wish I could emulate it.
But dreaming up a photo and pre-visualising it are extremely challenging. Once I have the idea, it's a different matter - because then it's just a technical exercise in realising it. Give me a theme and tell me to take a captivating photograph of it and I'll be lost. But describe the image to me and I'll do it.
Answers I've sought include:
- Giving up altogether on photography
- Taking beautiful landscapes that everyone praises me for (I'm not so artistically illiterate as to not recognise a beautiful landscape in front of me!)
- Trying to take artistic geometric abstract-type images
- Trying to reproduce favourite photographs from others
To Hell with whether it's arty or not. If I think it's gonna make a good picture, I'll shoot it. And I don't give a rat's whether anyone likes, or even gets the results.The heck with it. I'll just take pictures of whatever I want to!
For example: This is one of my favourite images that I made recently:
(It's OK, you don't have to like it!)
I've had this new approach for a couple of months now and I am pleased to report that everyone thinks I've gone insane. But I've been enjoying photography a lot more for it, and I'm actually starting to like some of the images that result from it.
I'm still going to practice the whole "concept and pre-visualisation" thing, but I've decided that this particular skill isn't strictly necessary in order to call yourself a photographer (as opposed to someone who merely takes photographs)

1 comments:
I really like you rnew basic principle. Good decision!
Post a Comment